1. No user installed addons are supported, python or otherwise.
2. No, they really are not supported.
3. They are not coming back
4. Read from 1. again

Any mention of illegal streaming sites, addons or any pirated material will not be tolerated. This is not democracy and any offenders will be banned and posts deleted immediately without warning.

Other than that, we hope you enjoy MrMC so far and we welcome any input and feedback you might have.

Team MrMC.

testing MrMC 3.2.0

User avatar
timstephens24
Posts: 590
Joined: 09 Dec 2015, 22:43

Re: testing MrMC 3.2.0

Post by timstephens24 » 13 Oct 2017, 19:12

I would suggest changing the "Allow HEVC/HDR" wording, since I thought I needed to have that checked to get HDR but in actuality it's completely the opposite.

User avatar
davilla
Team MrMC
Posts: 3360
Joined: 26 Oct 2015, 17:01

Re: testing MrMC 3.2.0

Post by davilla » 13 Oct 2017, 20:07

well, it follows the same order wording for mediacodec/interlaced on android.

I can't think of anything else that fits the logic, if vtb does not decode it, and afv is unchecked, then ffmpeg gets it. It's a trickle down effect.

A
B
C

If A does not handle, the passes to B, if not B, then C. It B is disabled, A -> C.

User avatar
timstephens24
Posts: 590
Joined: 09 Dec 2015, 22:43

Re: testing MrMC 3.2.0

Post by timstephens24 » 13 Oct 2017, 21:06

Just say "Use VideoToolBox for HEVC/HDR" and then add a note in the bottom saying AVFoundation is preferred instead of that. Or something.

Because A -> B -> C doesn't work but A -> C does.

User avatar
timstephens24
Posts: 590
Joined: 09 Dec 2015, 22:43

Re: testing MrMC 3.2.0

Post by timstephens24 » 13 Oct 2017, 21:08

Side note: can I get an iOS build to test on my iPad Pro with HDR support, please?

User avatar
davilla
Team MrMC
Posts: 3360
Joined: 26 Oct 2015, 17:01

Re: testing MrMC 3.2.0

Post by davilla » 13 Oct 2017, 21:35

timstephens24 wrote:
13 Oct 2017, 21:06
Just say "Use VideoToolBox for HEVC/HDR" and then add a note in the bottom saying AVFoundation is preferred instead of that. Or something.

Because A -> B -> C doesn't work but A -> C does.
A little redundant as the setting IS under videotoolbox. We could change the description from '"Allow hardware decoding of HEVC/HDR content" to "Use VideoToolBox for HEVC/HDR content but AVFoundation is preferred to get correct color mapping"

User avatar
timstephens24
Posts: 590
Joined: 09 Dec 2015, 22:43

Re: testing MrMC 3.2.0

Post by timstephens24 » 13 Oct 2017, 22:05

Yeah that would work, too, just something to help clear up any confusion.

User avatar
Everbrave
Posts: 235
Joined: 30 Dec 2016, 23:03

Re: testing MrMC 3.2.0

Post by Everbrave » 14 Oct 2017, 10:44

davilla wrote:
13 Oct 2017, 20:07
well, it follows the same order wording for mediacodec/interlaced on android.

I can't think of anything else that fits the logic, if vtb does not decode it, and afv is unchecked, then ffmpeg gets it. It's a trickle down effect.

A
B
C

If A does not handle, the passes to B, if not B, then C. It B is disabled, A -> C.
From the logical point of view, if-then-else describes an Implication relation. If A then B does not mean, however, If NOT-A then NOT-B. The simplest way is to use an OR-conjunction (Union), i.e., the checked methods are all enabled and can all be used. The selection of which method can be decided based on some "designer preference", e.g. energy efficiency on (e.g. iOS devices), frame-rate, Codec, etc.
My personal opinion is to reduce the menu selections to a minimum and handle such choices internally by the program based on the media and device information or global user setting such as screen resolution and/or compatibility (e.g. HDR), This not only enhances the user experience but also reduces the the -combinatorial- sources of malfunction.
I am aware of the challenges involved in rewriting the UI but it is an important issue for current generation of media players in general.

Lollypop
Posts: 20
Joined: 25 Feb 2017, 22:54

Re: testing MrMC 3.2.0

Post by Lollypop » 14 Oct 2017, 20:31

I am seeing some wierd audio on some of my AC3 files after installing the latest testflight.

Here is a sample: https://www.dropbox.com/s/bmkmoedaw1y6n ... o.m4a?dl=0

Has something changed?

User avatar
davilla
Team MrMC
Posts: 3360
Joined: 26 Oct 2015, 17:01

Re: testing MrMC 3.2.0

Post by davilla » 14 Oct 2017, 20:36

(20171014-c27c925)
skin.opacity: extend top bar label
darwin: tweaks to AVFoundation/VideoToolBox regarding number of retained demux packets

User avatar
davilla
Team MrMC
Posts: 3360
Joined: 26 Oct 2015, 17:01

Re: testing MrMC 3.2.0

Post by davilla » 14 Oct 2017, 20:38

Lollypop wrote:
14 Oct 2017, 20:31
I am seeing some wierd audio on some of my AC3 files after installing the latest testflight.

Here is a sample: https://www.dropbox.com/s/bmkmoedaw1y6n ... o.m4a?dl=0

Has something changed?
Please define " installing the latest testflight", were you previously running the 3.2 Testflight series or where you previously running some other version. If latter, which version ?

Post Reply

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 8 guests